As a growing number of airplanes scoured the southern Indian Ocean in the search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, authorities released new details that paint a different picture of what may have happened in the plane's cockpit.
Military radar tracking shows that the aircraft changed altitude after
making a sharp turn over the South China Sea as it headed toward the
Strait of Malacca, a source close to the investigation into the missing
flight told CNN. The plane flew as low as 12,000 feet at some point
before it disappeared from radar, according to the source.
The sharp turn seemed to be intentional, the source said, because
executing it would have taken the Boeing 777 two minutes -- a time
period during which the pilot or co-pilot could have sent an emergency
signal if there had been a fire or other emergency onboard.
Authorities say the plane didn't send any emergency signals, though some
analysts say it's still unclear whether the pilots tried but weren't
able to communicate because of a catastrophic failure.
The official, who is not authorized to speak to the media, told CNN that
the area the plane flew in after the turn is a heavily trafficked air
corridor and that flying at 12,000 feet would have kept the jet well out
of the way of that traffic.
Earlier Sunday, Malaysian authorities said the last transmission from
the missing aircraft's reporting system showed it heading to Beijing -- a
revelation that appears to undercut the theory that someone
reprogrammed the plane's flight path before the co-pilot signed off with
air-traffic controllers for the last time.
That reduces, but doesn't rule out, suspicions about foul play in the cockpit.
The new details give more insight about what happened on the plane, but
don't explain why the plane went missing or where it could be.
Analysts are divided about what the latest information could mean. Some
argue it's a sign that mechanical failure sent the plane suddenly off
course. Others say there are still too many unknowns to eliminate any
possibilities.
CNN aviation analyst Miles O'Brien called the fresh details about the flight a "game changer."
A satellite image released by China shows an object in the southern
Indian Ocean.A satellite image released by China shows an object in the
southern Indian Ocean.
Flight MH370: What went wrong? 'Gonna have to go out there and look'
"Now we have no evidence the crew did anything wrong," he said. "And in
fact, now, we should be operating with the primary assumption being that
something bad happened to that plane shortly after they said good
night."
If a crisis on board caused the plane to lose pressure, he said, pilots
could have chosen to deliberately fly lower to save passengers onboard.
"You want to get down to 10,000 feet, because that is when you don't
have to worry about pressurization. You have enough air in the
atmosphere naturally to keep everybody alive," he said. "So part of the
procedure for a rapid decompression ... it's called a high dive, and you
go as quickly as you can down that to that altitude."
Military radar tracked the flight between 1:19 a.m. and 2:40 a.m. the
day it went missing, the source told CNN, but it's not clear how long it
took the plane to descend to 12,000 feet.
The new details about altitude are "highly significant," said Mary
Schiavo, a CNN aviation analyst and former inspector general for the
U.S. Department of Transportation.
"It explains so many pieces that didn't fit together before," she said.
"Now, if we have a scenario where something happened, the plane made a
dramatic turn and dropped from 35,000 feet to 12,000 feet, this scenario
would fit what a pilot would do in the event of a catastrophic onboard
event, such as a rapid decompression, a fire, an explosion. That's what
you would have to do, descend, get down and turn around and try to get
back to an airport that could accommodate an ailing plane."
If the latest information is accurate, the theory of pilots trying to
save the plane fits, said Mark Weiss, a former American Airlines pilot
and CNN aviation analyst.
But that's a big if, he said.
"We've had so much information come out and so much contradictory
information come out, that I caution against jumping to any types of
conclusions at this point," he said.
Culled from CNN







0 comments:
Post a Comment